Date of Degree
MS (Master of Science)
Lina M. Moreno-Uribe
Introduction: Velopharyngeal inadequacy (VPI) may result in inappropriate oral/nasal coupling during the production of speech sounds, resulting in unwanted nasal resonance and/or nasal air emission. Orthognathic surgeries such as maxillary and/or mandibular advancements are also known to change skeletal and muscular structures resulting in changes affecting velopharyngeal closure (VPC). Although many studies have reported on the effect of maxillary advancement surgery on VPI for patients with cleft lip and palate, the effect of mandibular advancement on VPI has not been studied at length. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the effect of temporary prosthetic mandibular advancement on velopharyngeal function.
Methods: Fourteen subjects (7 males, 7 females) with no history of craniofacial abnormalities or speech disorders were recruited. The mean age was 35 years (range = 26-60). Acoustic nasalance measurements were obtained during nasal sentences and during sentences without nasal consonants in two conditions; normally, and while wearing an elastic mandibular advancement (EMA) appliance to advance the mandible by 13mm. In addition, subjects were asked to produce five repetitions of the sentence "Ten men came in when Jane left" while recordings were obtained with a videoendoscopy/phototransducer system that sensed the amount of light passing through the velopharyngeal orifice. The endoscope and fiber optic light were inserted through the subject's middle nasal meatus and positioned above the velum. The phototransducer fiber was extended through the velopharyngeal port into the upper oropharynx to detect light passing through the orifice as the velopharyngeal mechanism opened and closed. Individual subject's outcomes with and without the EMA appliance were analyzed statistically using paired t-test for Nasalance test, and one-way ANOVA/independent samples t-test for phototransducer test.
Results: Nasalance did not deteriorate, but significantly decreased for the ‘nasal’ sentences after mandibular advancement, whereas changes in nasalance were not significant for the sentences containing no nasal consonants after mandibular advancement. Mandibular advancement by a 13 mm using an EMA appliance did not significantly affect VPC. Instead, large variability among subjects in response to mandibular advancement. For 7 of the 14 subjects, the extent of VPC decreased significantly (p < .05) under the advanced mandible condition compared to the normal condition (without the EMA appliance). On the other hand, 5 subjects showed significantly (p < .05) increased VPC when their mandibles were advanced. For 2 subjects, VPC was not significantly changed with the advanced mandible.
Conclusions: The outcomes of this study suggested that there was no statistical evidence to support that nasality was deteriorated by a 13mm mandibular advancement, which agreed with recent studies describing velopharyngeal function and nasality after orthognathic surgeries. VPC was not affected by mandibular advancement. Responses of the nasalance and VPC to mandibular advancement were dependent on the individuals. Further investigation such as electromyography method is needed to understand how velopharyngeal function and speech respond to mandibular advancement more definitely.
Incomplete closure of the velopharyngeal (VP) port may result in inappropriate production of some speech sounds. Surgeries for upper and/or lower jaw advancements are known to change bone and muscular structures resulting in changes affecting the soft palate closure on the throat. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the effect of temporary advancement of the lower jaw on soft palate closure and speech. Fourteen subjects with no history of craniofacial abnormalities or speech disorders were recruited. A nasometer detects the % of the acoustic energy coming through the nose out of overall acoustic energy through the mouth and the nose, which is ‘nasalance’. Nasalance values were obtained during speech production of nasal sentences and sentences without nasal consonants in two conditions; normally, and while wearing an appliance for sleep apnea to advance the lower jaw by 13mm. Subjects were also asked to produce five repetitions of the nasal sentence "Ten men came in when Jane left" in two conditions. Movements of the soft palate were assessed using a videoendoscopy/phototransducer system, which sensed the amount of light passing through the velopharyngeal port. Nasalance was significantly decreased for the nasal sentences after the lower jaw advancement, but remained within a normal range. Velopharyngeal closure (VPC) did not significantly change after mandibular advancement, and was variable in response to the lower jaw advancement condition. Outcomes of this study demonstrated the effect of lower jaw advancement on VPC and speech. Implications for speech therapy and surgery are considered regarding individuals who require surgical advancement of the mandible.
publicabstract, mandibular advancement, nasalance, velopharyngeal closure
ix, 62 pages
Includes bibliographical references (pages 59-62).
Copyright 2015 Kyungsup Shin