Uncontested categories: the use of race and ethnicity variables in nursing research
Journal, Book or Conference Title
NLM Title Abbreviation
Classifying human beings according to race and ethnicity may seem straightforward to some but it, in fact, belies a difficult process. No standard procedure exists for categorizing according to race and ethnicity, calling into question the variables' use in research. This article explores the use of race and ethnicity variables in the nursing research literature. Content analysis was conducted of a sample of 337 original research studies published in Nursing Research from the years 1952, 1955, and then every 5 years through to 2000. Of the 337 research articles reviewed, 167 mentioned race, ethnicity, or their 81 code words or phrases. Out of the 167 articles, 153 used race or ethnicity to describe the study sample, and 45 of the 167 articles included race or ethnicity as an element of data analysis. Throughout the sample, there was substantial inconsistency related to race and ethnicity categorization, meanings of the terms, and use of these variables. Specificity related to conceptual assumptions, definitions, and context was missing and, as a result, data interpretation and understanding are suspect. The integrity of nursing knowledge requires that nurse researchers recognize and address the difficulties inherent in using race and ethnicity in health research.
Bias (Epidemiology), Continental Population Groups/classification, Cultural Diversity, Data Collection/methods/trends, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Ethnic Groups/classification, Humans, Nursing Research/methods/trends, Periodicals as Topic/trends, Publishing/trends, Reproducibility of Results, Research Design/trends, Socioeconomic Factors
Published Article/Book Citation
The definitive version was published in Nursing inquiry, 13:1 (2006) pp.52-63. DOI:10.1111/j.1440-1800.2006.00305.x.
This document is currently not available here.