Title
Cadherins, catenins and cell cycle regulators: impact on survival in a Gynecologic Oncology Group phase II endometrial cancer trial
Document Type
Article
Peer Reviewed
1
Publication Date
11-1-2011
Journal/Book/Conference Title
Gynecologic oncology
Volume
123
NLM Title Abbreviation
Gynecol Oncol
DOI
10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.07.005;
PubMed ID
21813170
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the clinical relevance of catenins, cadherins and cell cycle regulators in stage IV or recurrent endometrial carcinoma in a multi-center phase II trial (GOG protocol #119). METHODS: Tissue microarrays of metastatic or recurrent (n=42) tumor were developed and immunohistochemistry was performed. Average expression (percent staining x intensity) was assessed in tumor epithelium ((E)) and stroma ((S)) and categorized into tertiles (T1, T2, T3) for E-cadherin(E), N-cadherin(E), alpha-catenin(E), beta-catenin(E), gamma-catenin(E), p120-catenin(E) and Ki-67(E); as negative, below median or above median for p16(E), p27(E) and CD44(S); or as negative or positive for p53(E), Ki-67(S) and APC(S) (adenomatous polyposis coli). End points included response and survival. RESULTS: E-cadherin(E), p16(E), and p53(E) varied by race (p=0.003, p=0.024, p=0.002,) and N-cadherin(E), Ki-67(E), p16(E) and p27(E) by tumor type (p=0.015, p=0.011, p=0.005, p=0.021). Correlations were observed among E-cadherin(E) with p120(E) (r=0.66), p53(E) (r=-0.32), alpha-catenin(E) (r=0.52), beta-catenin(E) (r=0.58), and gamma-catenin(E) (r=0.58). High E-cadherin(E) (T2 or T3) versus low (T1) expression was associated with better survival in unadjusted (hazard ratio [HR]=0.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.06-0.37 or HR=0.17, 95% CI=0.07-0.42) and adjusted models (HR=0.18, 95% CI=0.05-0.59 or HR=0.22, 95% CI=0.07-0.70). High p16(E) versus negative expression was associated with worse survival in unadjusted (HR=3.87, 95% CI=1.74-8.61) and adjusted (HR=4.18, 95% CI=1.28-13.6) models. Positive versus negative expression of p53(E) was associated with worse survival in unadjusted (HR=2.31, 95% CI=1.16-4.60) but not adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: E-cadherin(E) and p16(E) appear to be clinically relevant, independent prognostic factors in stage IV or recurrent endometrial cancers treated with Tamoxifen and Medroxyprogesterone acetate, and merit further study.
Keywords
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cadherins/analysis, Catenins/analysis, Cell Cycle Proteins/analysis, Endometrial Neoplasms/chemistry/mortality/pathology, Female, Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors/analysis, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Nuclear Proteins/analysis, Prognosis, Tumor Markers, Biological/analysis
URL
http://ir.uiowa.edu/obgyn_pubs/9