•  
  •  
 

Peer Reviewed

1

Abstract

Since 1984, academic essays addressing the public rhetorics of science and technology have embodied at least four purposes: theory-building, discounting scientific representations, deprecating scientific influence, and strategizing to improve the efficacy of scientific rhetorics. Some of these purposes are in conflict with each other, but there has been little explicit discussion about the purposes for ARST studies. This essay argues in favor of a synthetic vision that places humanistic, social scientific, and natural science endeavors as part of an over-lapping set of practices, each of which demonstrably makes distinctive positive contributions to globalizing human consciousness. The essay argues that the few existing studies illustrate how increased internationalism in ARST studies is not only important in its own right, but also could provide one academic route for expanding the imagined relational possibilities among humanistic "critics," the natural or social sciences, and broader societies.

Keywords

global, new humanism, consilience, science and technology studies, human consciousness, rhetoric of science, Rhetoric of Science

Total Pages

9

Rights

Copyright © 2013 Celeste M. Condit

DOI

10.13008/2151-2957.1150

Additional Files

poroi0901-03.htm (32 kB)
HTML version of article

Share

COinS