Date of Degree
PhD (Doctor of Philosophy)
Andrew A. Forbes
First Committee Member
Stephen D Hendrix
Second Committee Member
Bryant F McAllister
Third Committee Member
George P Malanson
Fourth Committee Member
Fifth Committee Member
In the Midwestern US, forested and other woody plant habitats are embedded in a matrix of agricultural and urban landcover that alters configurations of “natural” habitats and creates novel habitat types. Variation in the type and juxtaposition of landcover in the matrix between habitats can profoundly impact the spatial and temporal distributions of insects. Intense urban and agricultural development alters habitats, increases fragmentation, and may decouple trophic interactions if plants or animals cannot disperse to needed resources. Specialist insects represent a substantial proportion of global biodiversity and their fidelity to discrete microhabitats provides a powerful framework for investigating organismal responses to human land use. Specialist herbivores and parasitoids that depend on discrete plant habitats simplify assessment of how trophic interactions, local demographic traits, and dispersal processes affect responses to landcover heterogeneity. Herbivore responses to landcover change are highly idiosyncratic and not well characterized. Parasitoid wasps are predicted to be more prone than their herbivore hosts to local extinction in response to increased habitat fragmentation, but often respond differently to similar landcover contexts. Understanding and predicting idiosyncratic spatial population dynamics of simple host-parasitoid communities and other insect systems requires integration of metacommunity-level ecological paradigms with spatial analyses across multiple spatial scales.
We sampled site occupancy and densities for two plant-herbivore-parasitoid systems from 250 sites across a 360 km2 urban/ agricultural landscape across three study years to ask whether and how human development decouples interactions between trophic levels. We first performed a single year analysis to investigate broad scale patterns. We compared patterns of site occupancy, host plant density, herbivory and parasitism rates of insects at two trophic levels with respect to landcover at multiple spatial scales. Geospatial analyses were used to identify landcover characters predictive of insect distributions. We found that herbivorous insect densities were decoupled from host tree densities in urban landcover types at several spatial scales. This effect was amplified for the third trophic level in one of the two insect systems: despite being abundant regionally, a parasitoid species was absent from all urban/ suburban landcover even where its herbivore host was common. Our results indicate that human land use patterns limit distributions of specialist insects. Dispersal constraints associated with urban built development are specifically implicated as a limiting factor.
Our multi-year analysis of trophic interactions in urban versus agricultural landcover showed that important results from our single-year study are consistent over time and provided useful insights into the factors mediating spatial distributions of specialist insects in altered landscapes. While we observed that insect species responded to landcover at consistent local- and landscape-scale spatial extents, we observed that coarse grain landcover categories (i.e. urban versus agricultural) at low spatial resolution yielded the most consistent patterns of organismal response. Our results indicate that agricultural versus urban landcover contexts can mediate distinct spatial population structuring across linked trophic levels. This finding has important implications for conservation and pest management strategies in heterogeneous landscapes and is an important consideration when translating heuristics regarding metacommunity dynamics from one broad spatial context to another.
Many animal species are profoundly impacted by landcover change resulting from urban and agricultural development; some species flourish, while other species decline or are eliminated in the face of changing landcover. Understanding how these different types of responses are generated is vital for the conservation of functional ecosystems. My dissertation research is focused on understanding how the distributions of specialist insects respond to urban and agricultural landcover. Insects are linchpins of functional ecosystems; these small organisms provide nutrient cycling, pollination, control of pests, food for other species, and other vital ecosystem services. A majority of insects are specialists, meaning that they need a specific plant or other insect species (host) as a food source and/ or living space in order to reproduce. Specialization is often associated with exaggerated sensitivity to habitat modification due to development. I predicted that associations between insects and their hosts would be weakened in urban relative to agricultural landcover due to a higher level of landcover modification. Further, I predicted that patterns of co-occurrence between insects and their hosts would differ between urban and agricultural cover in both space and time. Based on ecological and geospatial analysis methods, my results supported these predictions. My dissertation research provides useful insights into how the movements of specialist insects and strengths of their associations with their hosts may be differently affected by broad differences in urban versus agricultural human land use patterns.
publicabstract, landscape ecology, metacommunity, Rhagoletis cingulata, Rhagoletis suavis, tri-trophic, urban ecology
ix, 113 pages
Includes bibliographical references (pages 89-100).
Copyright 2015 Amanda E. Nelson