DOI
10.17077/etd.s18l7de1
Document Type
Dissertation
Date of Degree
Spring 2013
Degree Name
PhD (Doctor of Philosophy)
Degree In
Classics
First Advisor
John Finamore
First Committee Member
Carin Green
Second Committee Member
Craig Gibson
Third Committee Member
Paul Dilley
Fourth Committee Member
Ralph Keen
Abstract
The surviving fragments of Numenius' On the Good show the progression of a discernable argument; the dialogue as a whole deals with the search for a deeper understanding of the Form of the Good that is discussed in Plato's Republic. Fragment 1a provides a statement of method that governs Books 1-3. Book 1 attempts to use dialectical reasoning to reconstruct the "arguments" (logoi) of Pythagoras. Book 2 attempts to find confirmation of these arguments in the Platonic dialogues. Book 3 attempts to find further confirmation in the traditions of the "peoples of good repute." Fragment 9, taken from Book 3, gives a novel telling of the Jewish story of the Exodus, and is carefully constructed so as to be in conformity with Plato. It is best read as an allegory for the interaction of God and Matter. Book 4 is lost, but likely treated the necessity of a lower creator god beneath the highest god who is "free of labor." Book 5 introduces the Three Gods, who should be understood as the highest god, and two aspects of the lower god: a contemplative aspect and a creative aspect. Book 6 ties together the themes of the dialogue as a whole, and concludes that the Good is God.
Keywords
Middle Platonism, Numenius
Pages
iv, 188 pages
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references (pages 177-188).
Copyright
Copyright 2013 Joshua Lee Langseth
Recommended Citation
Langseth, Joshua Lee. "Knowing God: a study of the argument of Numenius of Apameia's On the good." PhD (Doctor of Philosophy) thesis, University of Iowa, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.17077/etd.s18l7de1