The idea of deducing legal rulings in Islamic law, or ijtihād, as well as the qualifications of the person who practices ijtihād, known as the mujtahid, has been a complex issue among Muslim ʿulamāʾ for centuries. Many Muslim ʿulamāʾ and Western scholars have maintained that the gate of ijtihād was closed. The title of mujtahid was therefore impossible to attain. The Moroccan intellectual al-Khamlīshī maintains that the strenuous conditions put forth by some of the Sunni jurists to qualify an individual to become a mujtahid actually contributed to the demise of ijtihād. These qualifications, according to al-Khamlīshī, were proven to be unachievable and stood as myriad obstacles in creating new generations to reform the old Islamic fiqh. This essay shows that, despite the extremely strenuous set of qualifications, through the writings of al-Khamlīshī, Moroccan women penetrated men’s domain in Islamic family law, breaking the long-standing monopoly men held therein.
ijtihād, fiqh, madhhab, ʿulamāʾ, ijmāʿ, sharīʿa.
Copyright © 2016 Nayel A Badareen
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Badareen, Nayel A.
"The Moroccan Jurist al-Khamlīshī: Can a Woman Become a Legislator (Mujtahid)?,"
Mathal: Vol. 5
, Article 2.
African History Commons, African Studies Commons, Biblical Studies Commons, First and Second Language Acquisition Commons, Gender and Sexuality Commons, History of Religion Commons, International Relations Commons, Islamic World and Near East History Commons, Jewish Studies Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Legal Commons, Legal Theory Commons, Modern Languages Commons, Near Eastern Languages and Societies Commons, Oral History Commons, Other International and Area Studies Commons, Other Philosophy Commons, Other Religion Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons, Political History Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, Race and Ethnicity Commons, Religion Law Commons, Sociology of Culture Commons, Women's Studies Commons