Title

Evaluation of the reliability and validity of nursing outcomes classification patient outcomes and measures

Document Type

Article

Peer Reviewed

1

Publication Date

1-1-2003

NLM Title Abbreviation

J Nurs Meas

Journal/Book/Conference Title

Journal of nursing measurement

PubMed ID

15274520

Abstract

One hundred sixty-nine of the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) patient outcomes were tested for interrater reliability, criterion validity, and sensitivity. In 10 field sites, ranging from hospitals to home care, pairs of nurses rated the outcome measures for 5 to 130 patients. Inter-class correlations were greater than or equal to 0.70 for 63 outcomes. Pearson's correlations with criterion measures were greater than or equal to 0.60 for 40 outcomes and from 0.39 to 0.60 for 43 additional ones. Change scores for 99 outcomes ranged from 0 to 2.0 from first to second and second to third rating. Most NOC measures demonstrated good inter-rater reliability, substantial criterion validity, and sensitivity to change. More testing and thorough training of nurses using NOC outcomes are needed.

Keywords

Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, North America, Nursing Assessment/classification/standards, Nursing Evaluation Research/methods, Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/classification/methods, Quality Indicators, Health Care/standards, Reference Standards, United States, Vocabulary, Controlled

Published Article/Book Citation

Journal of nursing measurement, 11:2 (2003) pp.97-117.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 

URL

https://ir.uiowa.edu/nursing_pubs/1058